Online prelicensure nursing students' experiences of academic incivility during COVID-19: A qualitative inquiry.

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe online prelicensure nursing students' experiences of incivility during COVID-19. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive. Five optional open-ended questions were presented to nursing students to share their experiences with incivility during the pandemic. METHODS: Data were collected from September to October 2020 as a part of a larger multimethod study on stress, resilience and incivility with nursing students and faculty (n = 710) from a large public undergraduate nursing programme in the southwestern United States. Out of the initial 675 students who completed the survey, 260 individuals responded to three or more of the open-ended questions which were reviewed and coded using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen themes were organized into four analytical categories: (1) experiencing incivility, (2) causes and consequences of incivility, (3) the pandemic and academic incivility and (4) promoting civility in the academic setting. CONCLUSIONS: Prelicensure nursing students perceived unrealistic expectations, a lack of awareness and miscommunication hindered academic performance, as well as, created feelings of stress, discouragement and inadequacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Fostering academic civility during virtual educational experiences may require training in proper coping strategies when challenged with incivility. IMPACT: As the body of research emerges concerning the effects of COVID-19 and undergraduate nursing education, understanding prelicensure students' experiences of academic incivility could prove to be beneficial to designing strategies co-created with students to promote positive educational outcomes. Understanding students' viewpoints of uncivil experiences revealed prioritizing civility awareness is essential in creating healthy academic environments, improving clinical performance and providing safe patient care. REPORTING METHOD: The COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) checklist was used. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Association of stress, resilience, and nursing student incivility during COVID-19.

Although incivility in nursing education is linked with negative physical and psychological effects on students, it is unclear how resilience and stress interact and relate to student incivility. The purpose was to understand the role of resilience and stress with peer incivility in a sample of prelicensure nursing students during coronavirus disease 2019. The study design was cross-sectional and correlational. Data were from an online survey administered to undergraduate nursing students of one college of nursing in a southwestern US state during September-October 2020. In a sample of 490 students, ordinal regression model results supported that including a stress and resilience interaction term resulted in a nonsignificant effect of stress and resilience, as the main effect correlates on low-level uncivil student behavior. More research is needed to understand the prevalence of stress and resilience at different points in prelicensure nursing education so that targeted interventions can be developed and deployed to assist students.

Relationships among stress, resilience, and incivility in undergraduate nursing students and faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic: Policy implications for nurse leaders.

BACKGROUND: Developing successful targeted interventions to reduce incivility for undergraduate nursing students and educators will require understanding the differences in their unique experiences. Although resilience may act as protective buffer against stressors, little is known about the relationships between stress, resilience, and perceptions of the frequency of incivility in the academic environment. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare relationships among and differences between perceptions of incivility frequency and self-reported stress and resilience levels in undergraduate nursing students and faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: A comparative descriptive and correlational research design was utilized. An online survey was used to collect data from undergraduate nursing students and faculty (n = 710) at one public university. RESULTS: Students were significantly more stressed and less resilient than faculty. Faculty reported significantly greater low and high-level student and low-level faculty incivility behaviors than students. CONCLUSION: Understanding student and faculty perceptions of uncivil behavior frequency occurring at the intersection of high stress and moderate resilience levels is key to the creation of targeted interventions and policy development.

Hospital nurses' moral distress and mental health during COVID-19.

AIMS: To explore factors associated with nurses' moral distress during the first COVID-19 surge and their longer-term mental health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, correlational survey study. METHODS: Registered nurses were surveyed in September 2020 about their experiences during the first peak month of COVID-19 using the new, validated, COVID-19 Moral Distress Scale for Nurses. Nurses' mental health was measured by recently experienced symptoms. Analyses included descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Outcome variables were moral distress and mental health. Explanatory variables were frequency of COVID-19 patients, leadership communication and personal protective equipment/cleaning supplies access. The sample comprised 307 nurses (43% response rate) from two academic medical centres. RESULTS: Many respondents had difficulty accessing personal protective equipment. Most nurses reported that hospital leadership communication was transparent, effective and timely. The most distressing situations were the transmission risk to nurses' family members, caring for patients without family members present, and caring for patients dying without family or clergy present. These occurred occasionally with moderate distress. Nurses reported 2.5 days each in the past week of feeling anxiety, withdrawn and having difficulty sleeping. Moral distress decreased with effective communication and access to personal protective equipment. Moral distress was associated with longer-term mental health. CONCLUSION: Pandemic patient care situations are the greatest sources of nurses' moral distress. Effective leadership communication, fewer COVID-19 patients, and access to protective equipment decrease moral distress, which influences longer-term mental health. IMPACT: Little was known about the impact of COVID-19 on nurses' moral distress. We found that nurses' moral distress was associated with the volume of care for infected patients, access to personal protective equipment, and communication from leaders. We found that moral distress was associated with longer-term mental health. Leaders should communicate transparently to decrease nurses' moral distress and the negative effects of global crises on nurses' longer-term mental health.